posted on 2025-03-12, 19:00authored byDhananjay Nanda
The article critiques ESG accounting by comparing it to historical failures in metrics-driven decision-making, such as Robert McNamara’s Vietnam War strategy and Paul Ehrlich’s overpopulation predictions. They argue that ESG accounting lacks transactional counterparties, making benefits difficult to measure and verify. ESG’s cost-benefit analysis often ignores opportunity costs and alternative solutions like adaptation or technological advances. The push for ESG also risks greenwashing, regulatory overreach, and inefficacy in corporate behavior change.
History
Language
English
Format
.pdf and online resource
Rights Statement
Copyright, Accountability in a Sustainable World Quarterly, CARE Center for Accounting Research and Education