posted on 2025-03-12, 19:24authored byEivind Lorgen, Jaclyn Allen
The debate on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing in the U.S. mirrors historical conflicts over scientific progress, such as the acceptance of a round Earth. While Europe and other regions broadly accept ESG, the U.S. remains divided. "Reactionary" ESG skeptics, often right-wing, reject ESG outright, while "revolutionary" skeptics, typically left-wing, demand broader ESG goals. Standardized sustainability accounting is crucial for clear investor decisions, preventing politicization, and ensuring effective ESG integration.
History
Language
English
Format
.pdf and online resource
Rights Statement
Copyright, Accountability in a Sustainable World Quarterly, CARE Center for Accounting Research and Education