Enriching Impact Assessment: Long-term Geospatial Evaluation in PeruRECONKA Inception Report
The Geospatial Impact Evaluation (GIE) team plans to conduct a geospatial impact evaluation using the Expanding the Reach of Impact Evaluation (ERIE) methodology within the Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Learning Innovations Program (MERLIN) USAID mechanism. ERIE facilitates retrospective, long-term impact evaluations of completed USAID interventions to assess if short-term impacts were sustained or if long-term outcomes emerged. This approach leverages existing program data and employs innovative data collection strategies to identify appropriate counterfactuals and generate lessons for planning and conducting long-term impact evaluations.
While many development interventions are assumed to have long-term impacts, evidence is often lacking due to a focus on short-term outcomes, rigid program cycles, unreliable funding for monitoring and evaluation, and shifting programmatic priorities. This lack of evidence hinders informed decision-making, particularly in sectors with theories of change extending beyond typical project cycles. Addressing this requires measuring policy or program results over extended periods and large geographic scales, which is currently rare. Such evaluations are well-suited to environmental and natural resources interventions where landscape change is typically measured at decadal or semi-decadal scales and across broad landscapes.
Two recent developments make long‐term evaluations in development programs more feasible now than in the past: First, the uptick in impact evaluations has built a portfolio of rigorously studied programs we can revisit for long‐term follow‐up. Second, a rapid improvement in the granularity, coverage, and nature of geospatial data — from both aid activities and outcomes— has created new opportunities for rigorous, quasi‐experimental evaluations, including retrospective analyses. For example, advances in geocoded data and big data analytical capabilities allow us to construct measures of broad economic activities across a landscape. Geocoding, GIS, and satellite imagery allow us to define what activities took place, where, when, and by whom. When merged with traditional socio-economic evaluation data, these new kinds of program and outcome data create potent opportunities for assessing long-term impacts that currently lack evidence.
We plan to utilize these innovations to understand the long-term impact of the Recuperación de Ecosistemas en Comunidades Kechwa y Awajun project (RECONKA). This project aimed to help Indigenous communities plan and coordinate their internal land uses and create a model for similar efforts in the region. In this evaluation, we will assess whether this project, which initially intervened with 17 Indigenous communities in the San Martín region, led to increased international coordination in these communities and decreased deforestation since the program was rolled out.
Funding
AID-OAA-A-16-00025
History
Date Created
2024-07-11Date Modified
2024-08-13Language
- English
Format
pdfPublisher
Pulte Institute for Global DevelopmentContributor
Jaclyn BiedronskiAdditional Groups
- Pulte Institute for Global Development