posted on 2009-12-09, 00:00authored byJoshua A. Cole
Recently, researchers in the foundations of mathematics have become interested in the distributive lattices P<sub>w</sub> and P<sub>s</sub>, the study of which is a major part of the field of "mass problems." In general, a mass problem U is a subset of ω<sup>ω</sup> (Baire space). We define U ≤<sub>s</sub> V if there is an index e for a computable functional so that for all f ∈ V, Φ<sub>e</sub><sup>f</sup> ∈ U. If we do not require the same e for every f, we get a "weak version": U &le<sub>w</sub> V if for all f ∈ V, there is an e so that Φ<sub>e</sub><sup>f</sup> ∈ U. <p> The relations ≤<sub>s</sub> and ≤<sub>w</sub> naturally induce equivalence relations ≡<sub>s</sub> and ≡<sub>w</sub>. We define P<sub>s</sub> to be the collection of ≡<sub>s</sub> degrees of nonempty Π<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub> subsets of 2<sup>ω</sup> (Cantor space); similarly, we define P<sub>w</sub> to be the collection of ≡<sub>w</sub> degrees of nonempty Π<sup>0</sup><sub>1</sub> subsets of 2<sup>ω</sup>. </p><p> An important open question is whether P<sub>w</sub> is dense. The result of Chapter 2 is that the embedding of the free distributive lattice on countably many generators into P<sub>s</sub> can be done densely. The way it is done gives indirect evidence that the kinds of priority arguments that show the density of P<sub>s</sub> are probably not strong enough to show the density of P<sub>w</sub>. The result of Chapter 3 applies these priority arguments to show the decidability of the elementary ∀∃-theory of P<sub>s</sub> as a partial order. The result of Chapter 5 is that certain index sets related to P<sub>w</sub> are Π<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub>-complete. This leads to a conjecture that the Turing degree of its elementary theory is as high as possible.</p>