University of Notre Dame
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Precision of testing the indirect effect for mediation studies

thesis
posted on 2011-07-18, 00:00 authored by Melissa Ann Mitchell
Sample size planning is often one of the first steps when planning a psychological study. Researchers generally need to know how many participants they will need to have 0.80 power. Recently, methodologists have taken another view on sample size planning, mainly planning a study to have an accurate and precise estimate (AIPE). This work focuses on the latter view on sample size planning for mediation studies (how large must a sample be to have an accurate estimate of the indirect effect). This work looks at four methods to assess mediation in two different models: a cross-sectional and longitudinal model. Single sample tests require the more participants than the resampling approaches in both models. Coverage rates vary between methods in the models but it appears that the percentile bootstrap has the best coverage rates. We also provide R and MPlus codes for researchers to examine parameter values we did not examine in this study so they can plan studies with adequate precision.

History

Date Modified

2017-06-05

Defense Date

2011-07-14

Research Director(s)

Scott E. Maxwell

Committee Members

Zhiyong Zhang Ken Kelley Lijuan Wang

Degree

  • Doctor of Philosophy

Degree Level

  • Doctoral Dissertation

Language

  • English

Alternate Identifier

etd-07182011-094429

Publisher

University of Notre Dame

Program Name

  • Psychology

Usage metrics

    Dissertations

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC