Rethinking Modern Citizenship: Towards a Politics of Integrity and Virtue
Chapter 1 is a broad introduction to and overview of the project. Chapter 2 outlines John Rawls's 'political liberal' ideal of citizenship, while chapter 3 shows that the Rawlsian ideal of citizenship is not viable, since it both fails its own test of legitimacy and egregiously undermines the integrity of citizens. In Chapter 4 I develop a positive account of the virtue of integrity and address some typical liberal objections against this virtue. Chapter 5 offers a deeper and broader diagnosis of the inadequacy of political liberalism by tracing this inadequacy to the assumptions of twentieth century contractualist moral theory. Finally, in chapter 6 I sketch part of an aretaic or virtue-ethical account of citizenship that merges insights from virtue ethics with insights from the liberal tradition. The aretaic account claims to be both more accommodating of integrity than contractualist models, and better equipped to understand and address traditional problems confronting a liberal regime, such as respect and political stability.
History
Date Modified
2017-06-02Defense Date
2006-02-22Research Director(s)
Michael ZuckertCommittee Members
David Solomon Mary Keys Fred DallmayrDegree
- Doctor of Philosophy
Degree Level
- Doctoral Dissertation
Language
- English
Alternate Identifier
etd-04212006-233234Publisher
University of Notre DameProgram Name
- Political Science