Growing the Good Food Revolution: Strategies of Sustainable Community in Two Urban Alternative Food Projects

Doctoral Dissertation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discover how young activist groups develop strategies of action – patterned ways of ordering action through time – in order to better understand the forces that shape these groups’ capacity to incubate transformative economic and social relationships. The study consists of a comparative ethnography of two nascent activist groups, acting independently of each other in two Rust Belt cities. Ethnographic data are supplemented by interview data and document analysis. Both groups perceived a lack of access to affordable, healthy, and sustainably produced food – “Good Food” – in their urban communities. By establishing alternative food projects, they hoped to address this problem in ways that would build social ties between community members and create new economic opportunities.

Study findings show that imagined futures of sustainable community powerfully mobilized activists and oriented their work. These future projections, and the strategies that activists initially utilized to pursue them, were informed by dominant narratives about the lack of Good Food in urban neighborhoods, as well as activists’ skills and prior knowledge. Over time, however, three intervening processes affected activists’ collective pursuit of sustainable community. First, activists adopted styles of conflict management that affect participation and, consequently, action. Second, activists’ busy schedules narrowed their horizon of engagement, and finally, activists’ social ties made variable resources available and legible for action. These intervening processes were particularly influential when the groups faced significant resource obstacles. Ultimately, these findings explain why groups struggle to establish patterns of action that create viable economic opportunities and durable social relationships in inner-city neighborhoods. They also explain why activists come to act in ways that seemingly undermine their best intentions. The study concludes with propositions for future research to establish a general theory of strategy formation in activist groups.

Attributes

Attribute NameValues
Author Amy E. Jonason
Contributor Lyn Spillman, Committee Member
Contributor Erika Summers-Effler, Research Director
Contributor Mary Ellen Konieczny, Committee Member
Contributor Terence McDonnell, Committee Member
Contributor Ann Mische, Committee Member
Degree Level Doctoral Dissertation
Degree Discipline Sociology
Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy
Defense Date
  • 2017-03-28

Submission Date 2017-04-10
Subject
  • urban farm

  • urban activism

  • food cooperative

  • civic engagement

  • strategic choice

  • community gardening

Access Rights Open Access
Content License
Departments and Units

Files

Please Note: You may encounter a delay before a download begins. Large or infrequently accessed files can take several minutes to retrieve from our archival storage system.

JonasonAE042017D.pdf

University of Notre Dame

Thumbnail

At the request of the author, this graduate work is not available to the public.

If you have Notre Dame credentials you can view this file after you Log in.

Otherwise, you must request permission to view this file from the Publications Manager of the Graduate School.

Request Access