Reconciliation in Occupied Germany, 1944-1954

Doctoral Dissertation

Abstract

During the decade between the collapse of the Nazi Empire and the end of Allied occupation of West Germany, a wide variety of individuals and groups in all four occupation zones began processes of reconciliation between Germans and their wartime enemies and victims. This dissertation studies those early steps toward reconciliation and compares and contrasts developments in the western zones of occupation, eventually the Federal Republic of Germany, and the eastern zone/German Democratic Republic. In many ways, interactions between the Allies and Germans in the first year of occupation supported reconciliatory efforts. However, Allied-German relations proceeded with a mandated distance between the two groups and through legal impositions on the German people. A different approach was needed in order to achieve the peaceful integration of Germany into international affairs. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) – international and German – provided such an alternative. Rather than addressing exclusively the statist concerns that drove Allied policies, NGOs prioritized attempts at reconciliation between individuals and communities, provided a crucial link between Germans and the outside world, and fostered dialogue in ways that governments and military personnel did not.

After the collapse of the Third Reich, most Germans were unwilling to engage critically with the recent past. Still, the conditions of Allied occupation and demands of the international community led Germans to acknowledge, however reluctantly, the crimes of the Nazi era. In all parts of occupied Germany, NGOs – aided by a disparate array of individuals – played a key role in shaping public memory of the past. In western Germany, Germans engaged in discussions and negotiations that acknowledged Nazi crimes and recognized victims of Nazism. Discourses created in eastern Germany also acknowledged Nazi crimes but did not admit that Germans in the Soviet zone/German Democratic Republic bore any responsibility for them. In general, the motives of people involved in initiating dialogue between former enemies and between perpetrators and their victims mattered less than actions and their repercussions. As the increasing divergence after 1947 between the situation in western and eastern Germany indicates, however, Allied support was necessary, if not sufficient, for any productive efforts at reconciliation.

Attributes

Attribute NameValues
URN
  • etd-04172008-212257

Author Steven Mark Schroeder
Advisor Doris Bergen
Contributor Thomas Kselman, Committee Member
Contributor Semion Lyandres, Committee Member
Contributor Wilson Miscamble, C.S.C., Committee Member
Contributor Doris Bergen, Committee Chair
Degree Level Doctoral Dissertation
Degree Discipline History
Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy
Defense Date
  • 2008-02-19

Submission Date 2008-04-17
Country
  • United States of America

Subject
  • Soviets

  • NGOs

  • Nazism

  • reparations

  • Allies

  • victims

  • Christian-Jewish relations

Publisher
  • University of Notre Dame

Language
  • English

Access Rights Open Access
Content License
  • All rights reserved

Departments and Units

Files

Please Note: You may encounter a delay before a download begins. Large or infrequently accessed files can take several minutes to retrieve from our archival storage system.

SchroederSM042008D.pdf

University of Notre Dame

Thumbnail

At the request of the author, this graduate work is not available to the public.

If you have Notre Dame credentials you can view this file after you Log in.

Otherwise, you must request permission to view this file from the Publications Manager of the Graduate School.

Request Access