Nicholas of Methone's Refutation of Proclus: Theology and Neoplatonism in 12th-century Byzantium

Doctoral Dissertation
Thumbnail

Abstract

This dissertation is a study of Nicholas of Methone’s Refutation (Ἀνάπυξις) of the neoplatonist Proclus’ Elements of Theology. Despite being one of three full-length medieval commentaries on this work, Nicholas’ Refutation has hitherto received relatively little attention. This dissertation aims to bring his work to a wider audience by providing an English translation of the work and a systematic study of its major themes. Chapter 1 briefly outlines the significance of the issues dealt with in Nicholas’ work. Chapter 2 then sets the stage for Nicholas’ Refutation by tracing the Christian reception of Proclus from Dionysius the Areopagite until Nicholas’ time. Chapter 3 reviews the history of scholarship on Nicholas and the Refutation in particular, giving extended attention to the claim that his Refutation is plagiarized from an earlier work by Procopius of Gaza. Chapter 4, which is the heart of the dissertation, is an extended consideration of the major themes of Nicholas’ work, and of how they relate to each other. I show that Nicholas’ fundamental concern is to distinguish the Christian doctrines of Creation and Trinity from the Emanationist and Unitarian metaphysics of Proclus’ Elements, and that apophatic theology plays a prominent role in Nicholas’ defense of Christian teaching. In this chapter I also explore the tensions and ironies involved in Nicholas’ attempt to read Dionysius against Proclus. In Chapter 5 I briefly survey aspects of Nicholas’ work that await further attention, and I trace the reception of the Refutation in the Greek and Latin contexts. Appendix A, a complete English translation of Nicholas’ Refutation, is this dissertation’s most substantial contribution to scholarship, and is the foundation for my study of the Nicholas’ thought in Chapter 4. Appendix B takes note of two manuscript “discoveries,” and the table in Appendix C allows for an easy comparison between Nicholas’ Chapter 122 and Proclus’ Proposition 122 which it paraphrases.

Attributes

Attribute NameValues
URN
  • etd-07182014-152755

Author Joshua Morton Robinson
Advisor Stephen Gersh
Contributor Stephen Gersh, Committee Co-Chair
Contributor Alexandros Alexakis, Committee Member
Contributor Yury Avvakumov, Committee Member
Contributor Brian Daley, Committee Co-Chair
Contributor Charles Barber, Committee Member
Degree Level Doctoral Dissertation
Degree Discipline Medieval Studies
Degree Name PhD
Defense Date
  • 2014-04-25

Submission Date 2014-07-18
Country
  • United States of America

Subject
  • Gaza

  • Tornikes

  • Institutio

  • Damascus

  • Methones

  • Athens

  • Platonic

  • Nazianzus

  • Petrizi

  • Panteugenos

  • Synodicon

  • Petritsi

  • Byzantium

  • Italos

  • Creation

  • Refutation

  • Philoponus

  • John

  • Nicolaus

  • Lycia

  • Psellos

  • Eustratios

  • Moosburg

  • Trinity

  • logic

  • Psellus

  • Maximus

  • Nikolaos

  • Prodromos

  • Babel

  • Nikolaus

  • Nicholas

  • Mefouskij

  • Methonaios

  • heresy

  • Methone

  • Gregory

  • Methonaeus

  • Refutatio

  • apophaticism

  • Maximos

  • Diadochus

  • Berthold

  • Μεθωνης

  • Emanation

  • Procli

  • immanence

  • Comnena

  • orthodoxy

  • fecundity

  • apophatic

  • 1082

  • Modon

  • Byzantine

  • Commentary

  • Italus

  • plagiarism

  • Sebastocrator

  • rationalism

  • Theologica

  • transcendence

  • Nikolaj

  • Neo-platonic

  • Dionysius

  • Soterichos

  • Browning

  • Proclus

  • Elements

  • ἀνάπυξι`

  • Theology

  • anaptyxis

  • Clucas

  • Neoplatonic

  • Elementatio

  • Mefonskij

  • theology

  • philosophy

  • Stoicheiosis

  • Nicolas

  • Messinia

  • Procopius

Publisher
  • University of Notre Dame

Language
  • English

Record Visibility and Access Public
Content License
  • All rights reserved

Departments and Units

Files

Please Note: You may encounter a delay before a download begins. Large or infrequently accessed files can take several minutes to retrieve from our archival storage system.