Taken on Faith: The Concept of Religion in First Amendment Jurisprudence

Doctoral Dissertation
Thumbnail

Abstract

The United States Constitution protects the free exercise of religion, but does not define what religion is. Religious liberty in the United States, however, hinges on the meaning of this term in the First Amendment. This dissertation describes and analyzes how the Supreme Court has conceptualized religion in its free exercise jurisprudence. Based on the analysis of free exercise cases decided between 1878 and 2005, this study finds that justices have offered three different accounts of religion. It classifies these as ontological, sociological, and individualistic approaches" depicting religion with reference to truth, groups, and individuals, respectively. The Supreme Court’s earliest free exercise decisions address religion ontologically, defining it in terms of metaphysical truth. The Court’s subsequent efforts to avoid ontology result in two distinct lines of religion decisions. Each of these reflects an alternative definitional method" one individualistic, one sociological. The individualistic approach construes religion in broad and indefinite terms, avoiding Establishment Clause conflicts by excluding very little from the category of “religion." The sociological mode proves narrower, appealing to the characteristics of recognized religious groups to identify and protect religious conduct. While the present state of religion jurisprudence remains convoluted, this dissertation offers three conclusions. First, the three-fold model for how justices think about religion proves a useful tool for describing and analyzing Supreme Court opinions regarding religious exercise. Second, applied to the history of free exercise jurisprudence, this model helps to explain variations in the Court’s decisions. Third, while the Supreme Court’s current individualistic approach provides relatively little protection to religion, returning to a more ontological mode offers some promise.

Attributes

Attribute NameValues
URN
  • etd-07202007-033508

Author Jesse David Covington
Advisor Donald Kommers
Contributor Donald Kommers, Committee Chair
Degree Level Doctoral Dissertation
Degree Discipline Political Science
Degree Name PhD
Defense Date
  • 2007-05-22

Submission Date 2007-07-20
Country
  • United States of America

Subject
  • Religion

  • Free Exercise Clause

  • religious liberty

  • religious freedom

  • definition of religion

  • constituion

Publisher
  • University of Notre Dame

Language
  • English

Record Visibility Public
Content License
  • All rights reserved

Departments and Units

Files

Please Note: You may encounter a delay before a download begins. Large or infrequently accessed files can take several minutes to retrieve from our archival storage system.