Behavioral finance studies reinforce the idea of market inefficiency, suggesting that it is possible for informed investors to produce above-average returns on their investments. For “know-something” investors, portfolio diversification reduces risk at the expense of maximizing return, defeating the main purpose of investing in stocks. In psychological measurement terms, this practice resembles increasing a scale’s reliability at the expense of its validity. To illustrate this concept, 20 stockbrokers each created a portfolio of up to 20 stocks, separating their “top picks” from others in their portfolio. Results showed that portfolios of brokers’ “top picks” outperformed their diversified portfolios after a one-year period. While not statistically significant, results likely have great practical significance, and thus speak to the value of future studies on this topic.
Against Diversification: A Suggested Strategy for the Know-Something Investor
Doctoral DissertationAbstract
Attribute Name | Values |
---|---|
URN |
|
Author | Chaunce R. Windle |
Advisor | George Howard |
Contributor | Anita Kelly, Committee Member |
Contributor | George Howard, Committee Chair |
Contributor | Susan Steibe-Pasalich, Committee Member |
Contributor | Scott Maxwell, Committee Member |
Degree Level | Doctoral Dissertation |
Degree Discipline | Psychology |
Degree Name | PhD |
Defense Date |
|
Submission Date | 2010-07-22 |
Country |
|
Subject |
|
Publisher |
|
Language |
|
Record Visibility | Public |
Content License |
|
Departments and Units | |
Catalog Record |
Files
1 entry found