Medicine, Then and Now: The Problem of Using Persistence as a Measure for Medical Efficacy

Master's Thesis

Abstract

Modern Western biomedicine is in need of new drugs, and ethnopharmacologists are turning to premodern medical texts, such as the Anglo-Saxon Leechbooks, for remedies. To determine which premodern remedies to test in laboratory settings, historians must be more than translators; they must also determine which remedies are likely to be efficacious. In previous studies, historians have associated persistence of remedies in materia medica throughout the centuries with biomedical efficacy, but this association is problematic for two reasons. First, it is not clear that people, without the aid of controlled trials and statistical tests, can determine the effectiveness of drugs. Second, biomedical efficacy may not be the reason for a remedy’s persistence since theory or tradition can also be influential. Historians, therefore, should use different criteria to determine efficacy. Historians can instead identify remedies that would have immediate effects or remedies for chronic or non-self-limiting diseases.

Attributes

Attribute NameValues
Author Julianna Poole
Contributor Robert Goulding, Research Director
Contributor Evan Ragland, Committee Member
Contributor Christopher Hamlin, Committee Member
Degree Level Master's Thesis
Degree Discipline History and Philosophy of Science
Degree Name MA
Defense Date
  • 2017-03-31

Submission Date 2017-10-25
Subject
  • medieval medicine

  • history of medicine

  • Leechbook

  • Anglo-Saxon England

  • ethnopharmacology

Record Visibility and Access Public
Content License
Departments and Units

Files

Please Note: You may encounter a delay before a download begins. Large or infrequently accessed files can take several minutes to retrieve from our archival storage system.