University of Notre Dame
Browse

File(s) under embargo

2

month(s)

9

day(s)

until file(s) become available

The Effect of Confirmation Bias and Perceptual Disfluency on Juror Decision-Making and Memory Retention

thesis
posted on 2022-07-13, 00:00 authored by Morgan Munsen

The effects of confirmation bias on juror decision-making have long been a topic of investigation, as this line of questioning allows for academic study of human decision-making while also speaking to an important social reality. However, very few studies have extended this work into the field of memory. Across two experiments, this dissertation addressed this gap in the field by assessing memory retention in a juror decision-making task where participants were subject to an experimentally-manipulated, trial-specific initial bias towards the defendant. The second experiment also addressed the novel area of confirmation bias mitigation by implementing a perceptual disfluency manipulation—a manipulation which has been hypothesized to operate by shifting individuals from a heuristic mode of processing into an analytical mode of processing. The decision-making results showed a dissociation where Juror Bias Scale score (a measure of pre-existing personal biases towards the criminal justice system) predicted verdicts while the experimentally-manipulated initial bias predicted suggested length of sentence—both in a direction that supported an effect of confirmation bias on decision-making. Additionally, results failed to replicate previous findings where disfluency mitigated the effect of confirmation bias on decision-making. Results on memory showed that information that supported a guilty verdict and information that supported a not guilty verdict were both remembered better overall and had steeper slopes of forgetting than neutral information. Overall, this study emphasized the need to consider factors beyond trial-specific bias (such as the pre-trial bias captured by the Juror Bias Scale) when predicting juror decision-making and found that memory outcomes in this type of task are better predicted in light of theories such as the goal relevance hypothesis of memory facilitation (rather than through the posited effects of confirmation bias).

History

Date Modified

2022-07-25

Defense Date

2022-07-05

CIP Code

  • 42.2799

Research Director(s)

Joshua D. Koen

Degree

  • Doctor of Philosophy

Degree Level

  • Doctoral Dissertation

Alternate Identifier

1337032704

Library Record

6259655

OCLC Number

1337032704

Program Name

  • Psychology, Research and Experimental

Usage metrics

    Dissertations

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC