RodriguezRR062004.pdf (102.1 kB)
Health Effects of Disclosing Personal Secrets to Accepting Versus Non-Accepting Confidants
thesis
posted on 2004-06-22, 00:00 authored by Robert Rene RodriguezIn Experiment 1, undergraduates (N = 87) wrote either about trivial events or about a secret while imagining (a) an accepting confidant, (b) a non-accepting confidant, or (c) no confidant. Unlike the no-confidant group, the accepting group reported fewer illnesses at 8-week follow-up than did the non-accepting and trivial groups, especially to the extent that this group found their confidants to be accepting and discreet. Experiment 2 (N = 74) used the same design, except that the confidant manipulation came after the writing. Eight weeks later, the accepting group' having imagined reactions that were more accepting and less judgmental than the non-accepting group' again reported fewer illnesses than did the non-accepting and trivial groups. The author suggests that when people keep personal secrets, they often do so because they fear being ostracized. Revealing to an accepting confidant can reduce distress associated with not belonging and, therefore, can lead to health benefits.
History
Date Modified
2017-06-02Defense Date
2003-07-29Research Director(s)
Anita E. KellyCommittee Members
David A. Smith Laura Carlson Anre Venter Thomas V. MerluzziDegree
- Doctor of Philosophy
Degree Level
- Doctoral Dissertation
Language
- English
Alternate Identifier
etd-06222004-094156Publisher
University of Notre DameProgram Name
- Psychology
Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC