“Through the Features of Men’s Faces”: The Political Community in Francisco Suárez and John Locke

Doctoral Dissertation

Abstract

John Locke is commonly associated with the emergence of classical liberalism and the most fundamental features of modern politics, especially with respect to consent based government, constitutionalism, individual rights, and toleration. There is a great body of Catholic political thought, however, developed just prior to Locke’s life and career, that also provided theoretical treatments of many of the same concerns that animated early modern liberalism. Famous among his contemporaries as a theologian and philosopher, Francisco Suárez, S.J., died only a decade and a half before Locke was born and wrote on many of the same political issues that made Locke famous. Although Suárez is less well-known now, he had an immediate connection to Locke: Robert Filmer, the man against whom Locke directed the entire First Treatise on Government, was himself writing against Jesuit political thought and mentions Suárez by name as an example.

Suárez and Locke’s mutual antagonism to divine right absolutism is not the only thing they had in common. Both are credited as early theorists of the social contract and both use their theories of consent based government to develop theories of resistance and change for government. The similarities in their political thought are made more remarkable by considering their opposing philosophical and theological stands: in addition to being a Catholic priest, Suárez was an Aristotelian operating fully within the scholastic tradition; Locke was attracted to the dissenting Protestants in England, and rejected scholastic methods of inquiry in favor of a more scientific, empirical approach.

In this dissertation I will closely examine the thought of Suárez and Locke on human life, natural law, and political community in order to determine whether their outstanding theological and philosophical disagreements affect their political conclusions as well. I argue that despite their many political similarities, these more fundamental differences do lead to substantially different political thought, especially concerning the areas of religion and toleration, the direction of legislation, and moral obligation, and that Suárez’s preservation of the theological and philosophical tradition allows him to avoid problems that Locke’s newer approach faces.

Attributes

Attribute NameValues
Author Catherine S. Kuiper
Contributor Michael Zuckert, Research Director
Degree Level Doctoral Dissertation
Degree Discipline Political Science
Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy
Defense Date
  • 2017-07-25

Submission Date 2017-08-07
Access Rights Open Access
Content License
  • All rights reserved

Files

Please Note: You may encounter a delay before a download begins. Large or infrequently accessed files can take several minutes to retrieve from our archival storage system.

KuiperCS082017D.pdf

University of Notre Dame

Thumbnail

At the request of the author, this graduate work is not available to the public.

If you have Notre Dame credentials you can view this file after you Log in.

Otherwise, you must request permission to view this file from the Publications Manager of the Graduate School.

Request Access