University of Notre Dame
Browse
ShortCF042020T.pdf (866.49 kB)

Sympathy and Empathy for a Rival Lover: A Comparative Study of Chariton's Callirhoe and the Acts of Andrew

Download (866.49 kB)
thesis
posted on 2020-04-27, 00:00 authored by Cana Short

This thesis contributes to the comparative study of ancient novelistic literature by examining the characterization of the primary rival lover figure in Chariton’s Callirhoe and the Acts of Andrew, two Greek novels dated to the first through third centuries CE. In Chariton’s Callirhoe, this rival lover is Dionysius, whose love for and marriage to the novel’s female protagonist – Callirhoe – temporarily prevents her from being reunited to her first husband and lover, Chaereas. In the Acts of Andrew, the central rival lover is the pagan husband Aegeates, who is a 'rival' insofar as he is an enemy to the apostle Andrew (the story's protagonist) and his wife’s unwanted lover.

This study explores features of Dionysius' and Aegeates' characterization that lead readers to empathize or sympathize with them. In my analysis of empathy, I adopt the recent cognitive approach to narrative immersion, which refers to the reader's mental state of being absorbed in the narrative world such that she may experience it as if it were the actual world. In my analysis of sympathy, I examine instances of mediated sympathy (i.e., sympathetic in-frame reactions towards the rival) alongside passages that portray the rival's suffering as not primarily caused by his own culpable actions.

This thesis advances comparative scholarship on the ancient novels by demonstrating that similarities between the Greek novels and Apocryphal Acts are not limited to motifs and themes, but extend to narrative strategy. This study also contributes to a recent trend within scholarship that reassesses the literary quality of these texts. By showing the complexity of Dionysius’ and Aegeates’ characterization, this study challenges the established scholarly view that ancient novelistic characters lack any kind of depth. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the usefulness of the distinction between 'sympathy' and 'empathy' in reader-response approaches to the ancient novels and Christian Apocryphal Acts.

History

Date Modified

2020-05-31

CIP Code

  • 16.1200

Research Director(s)

Aldo C. Tagliabue

Committee Members

Hildegund Müller Janet Spittler

Degree

  • Master of Arts

Degree Level

  • Master's Thesis

Language

  • English

Alternate Identifier

1155520389

Library Record

5503863

OCLC Number

1155520389

Program Name

  • Classics

Usage metrics

    Masters Theses

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC